Part 3 – PEC Parameter Optimization
Speaker:
Doc Daugherty, Nezih Ünal - GenISys GmbH
Takeaways:
- Detailed PEC parameter overview
- Selection of PSF
- Layer specific PEC
- PEC fracture optimization and minimize number of shapes
- Process loading and lateral development correction
Summary of the Webinar:
- Optimization of the layer for PEC
- All (and only) pattern for exposure in the resist should be included
- PEC is able to maintain layers
- Use layer for writing order control
- Use different layer (bulk/sleeve or coarse/fine) beam currents for combining accuracy and speed in one exposure
- The correction can be only as good as the correction function
- Monte-Carlo simulated (table defined) PSF
- Adding a mid-range “Gamma” process blur to Monte Carlo PSF
- Some resist process effects (e.g. HSQ)
- Definition of “Effective Short-Range Blur” for short-range correction
- Optimizing PEC accuracy vs. shape count
- Define dose classes by % dose accuracy
- Higher accuracy requires more dose classes, more shapes
- PEC fracturing parameter, specifically minimum figure size (MFS) give control on the number of shapes
- Selected layer can be excluded from LR fracturing or/and short-range correction
- Define dose classes by % dose accuracy
- Advanced Correction parameter and model
- Lateral development can be corrected by a PSF-Density dependent Bias table (from experiment, or better TRACER calibration)
- High density substrates with low contrast resists may require “Uniform Clearing” correction model, or a “Mix-Factor” between Optimum Contrast (OC) and Uniform Clearing (UC). The mix-factor may be calibrated by TARCER